Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM Uživatelský manuál Strana 7

  • Stažení
  • Přidat do mých příruček
  • Tisk
  • Strana
    / 38
  • Tabulka s obsahem
  • KNIHY
  • Hodnocené. / 5. Na základě hodnocení zákazníků
Zobrazit stránku 6
7
Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows
Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs
in common business scenarios
Viewing data in Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006
As Figures 5 and 6 show, the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 was
1.25 times faster
than the AMD Athlon
64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
on this test.
Figure 6 shows that
this difference meant
that the Intel vPro
technology-based PC
with the Intel Core 2
Duo processor
E6700 finished the
task more than a
second faster than
the AMD Athlon 64
X2 5200+ processor-
based PC.
PERFORMANCE RESULTS
(seconds)
COMPARATIVE RATING
AMD Athlon 64 X2
5200+ processor on
ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM
Intel vPro with Core 2
Duo processor E6700
on Intel DQ965GF
TASKS
AMD Athlon 64 X2
5200+ processor on
ASUS M2NBP-VM CSM
Intel vPro with Core 2
Duo processor E6700
on Intel DQ965GF
5.20 4.15
Task: Viewing
memorized
reports in
QuickBooks
1.00 1.25
Figure 6: Results for the Intuit QuickBooks scenario for both test systems. Lower performance results are better. Higher
comparative ratings are better.
Figure 5: Normalized results for the Intuit QuickBooks scenario for both test systems. Larger
numbers indicate better performance.
Intuit QuickBooks scenario
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
V
iew ing mem orized reports in
Intuit Quick Books Pro 2006
Performance relative to AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
Intel vPro technology based
PC w ith Intel Core 2 Duo
processor E6700
Zobrazit stránku 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 37 38

Komentáře k této Příručce

Žádné komentáře